Gren Invest: Mastering the Art of International Taxation
A vital subject for any company or individual doing business globally. It is a field of law that helps determine the tax consequences of cross-border transactions in which at least two countries are involved. Globalization is interlinking economies like never before and a working knowledge of these intricate rules has become “must know” knowledge for any financial institution hoping to stay competitive and compliant. The real headache is wrestling with the labyrinth of an array of often conflicting tax systems to avoid double taxation – being taxed twice over for the same income in two countries – and comply with all your legal obligations. It is a highly complex area and requires in-depth knowledge of tax treaties, foreign tax credits and the domestic law of all relevant jurisdictions. The environment is fluid and governments globally are working together to combat tax evasion and achieve fair taxation, especially across MNCs, the digital economy. That said, remaining informed is the key to risk management and making the most of one’s global tax position.
Without a comprehensive understanding of the tax landscape venturing into international business can result in costly financial mishaps and legal consequences. The principles of international taxation are founded on a jurisdictional dispute as to which country has the claim to tax income, generally considerations related to residency and source of income. "Permanent establishment," which is the level of business presence in a country that triggers tax obligations, and transfer pricing (dealing with transactions involving related parties) are key examples. At Gren Invest, we strive to simplify these challenges and provide easy-to-understand actionable advice. International tax planning is not about loopholes, but a sustainable, and compliant framework which considers business strategy. There are many details to consider, from selecting the right corporate structure to carefully handling profit repatriation. Taking this proactive stance is key to managing tax exposures effectively and ultimately fostering long-term growth and that all-important stability in the global economy for businesses of every size.
Winning in this space demands a combination of technical know-how, predictive strategy, and ongoing education. The rules are not carved in stone; they take into account economic developments and policy initiatives, including as part of the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project. To individuals, topics such as establishing tax residency, dealing with foreign-earned income and navigating estate tax implications across borders are paramount. On the corporate side, this has manifested itself as a focus on streamlining your global supply chain, protecting IP and compliance with ever-more stringent disclosure regimes. Patience, detailed note taking and a long-term outlook are requirements. By knowing the basic concepts and updates, you can take decisions which secure your wealth and empower your global financial condition - even making intricate challenges to be strategic assets.
Latest International Taxation Articles
Top Questions Answered
Double Tax Treaty/ Double Tax Agreement (DTAA) A tax treaty also known as a DTA is a Contract between two countries that covers issues concerning double taxation of passive and active income for the citizens and residents of the contracting countries. Its main aim is to elucidate and allocate taxing powers between the two jurisdictions so that an income may not be taxed twice both by host as well as source countries. They do so by providing the rules that apply for determining tax residence, delineating various categories of income and specifying how double taxation is to be relieved (by exemption or under a credit system). They usually feature lower tax rates on dividends, interest or royalties to one country’s residents from the other. Tax treaties between tax paying jurisdictions also allow for cooperation between them in reporting, while reducing instances of tax avoidance or evasion.
Transfer pricing is the rules and methods for pricing transactions between enterprises under common ownership or control within a multination enterprise. These transactions can involve the exchange of goods, services or intangibles. At the heart of transfer pricing is the so-called “arm's length principle” which posits that transactions with related entities should be priced as if they were between unrelated entities. It is essential for tax authorities to prevent multinational enterprises from performing artificial price adjustments in order to transfer profits across high-tax and low-tax jurisdictions, thus undermining the tax base. Sufficient transfer pricing documentation is part of the key to proving that you complied and to avoiding significant penalties in a high priority area of international tax planning and risk management.
Anti-tax-avoidance and Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) provisions are a set of tax rules to limit resident taxpayers who can defer the payment of income related undertaxed passive income held through low-taxed foreign subsidiaries. Put simply, when a foreign corporation is ``controlled'' by residents of another country (e.g., the foreign shareholders own more than 50% of the stock), these rules can result in immediate taxation to the resident stockholders on their share of the CFC's income even if such profits have not been paid to them as dividends. The rules tend to concentrate on "passive" income, such as interest, dividends and royalties, which can be easily shuffled between countries. The aim is to eliminate tax benefits of stashing profits in foreign entities and bring funds back home.
The foreign tax credit is a mechanism to avoid double taxation for taxpayers who work and earn income from foreign sources. In effect, it permits a person or corporation to claim a credit (dollar for dollar reduction) of the same amount that they have paid a foreign government in taxes against the U.S. tax bill on the same income. For instance, if a corporation makes profits in another country and pays corporate income tax to that other country, the company can take a credit for that foreign tax against its domestic tax bill due on the same earnings. The credit is almost always subject to a limit, normally the amount of domestic tax that would be due on such foreign income. This will guarantee that the credit does not eliminate foreign tax on foreign-source income.
BEPS is an acronym for Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. It concerns tax planning techniques used by some multinational enterprises that exploit these gaps and mismatches to artificially shift profits to low or no-tax locations where there is little or no economic activity. A joint initiative involving more than 140 countries to tackle this is the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS. It has also put forward 15 "Actions" (or measures) designed to provide governments with solutions that will keep the taxation of profits in line with the locations where economic activities creating value for tax purposes take place. They are part of broader efforts to ensure coherence in international tax rules, strengthen substance requirements and increase transparency and certainty for tax payers.
In international taxation, a permanent establishment (PE) is a fixed place of business which generally gives rise to income or value-added tax liability in a particular jurisdiction. The presence of a PE in a foreign country is an important threshold which normally entitles the host country to tax profits attributable thereto. A PE may be formed through a fixed place of business, such as an office, factory or branch, or in certain cases through the activities of a dependent agent who has and habitually exercises the authority to conclude contracts for it. The precise nature of a PE is generally defined in tax treaties which state when and how a company’s presence in a country becomes significant enough to attract taxation there.
Taxing the digital economy is a significant challenge for traditional international tax framework that is largely founded on physical presence. Many countries, in turn, have adopted Digital Services Taxes (DSTs), which are essentially turnover taxes on the revenue generated by certain digital activities (such as online advertising or data sales). At the same time, the OECD is also driving a worldwide initiative dubbed the “Two-Pillar Solution” to formulate a consensus-based overhaul. Pillar One seeks to re-allocate profit taxing rights to market jurisdictions where customers/users are located irrespective of physical presence. Pillar Two A second pillar is aimed at a global minimum corporate tax rate to avoid any “race to the bottom.” This field continues to be very dynamic as international consensus evolves.
Tax residence: The status that determines in which country an individual or a company is primarily liable to pay income tax. For private persons, residence is usually based on various aspects such as physical presence (i.e., being present in a country for more than 183 days per year), the place of one's home and of their center of vital interests. For the companies it is usually decided to be the place where incorporation or effective management and control took place. It is also key as most resident taxpayers are taxed on a worldwide basis, whereas non-residents are usually only taxed on income derived from within the country. Tax treaties have “tie-breaker” rules to determine which of two countries a person or entity is resident in at the same time.
International taxes implications applies to the variety of transactions across borders. Some of the key types are sales of goods or services to non-resident customers, which could trigger issues in connection with value added tax (VAT) or good and service tax (GST), and whether a permanent establishment is created. Another significant issue is licensing of intellectual property, like patents or trademarks and the associated withholding tax on royalty payments. Financing transactions, such as intercompany loans, also raise concerns about withholding taxes on interest. Last, but not least is equity investments and profits distributions, like the payments of dividends to a foreign parent company also an important category that are often subject to withholding tax which can be limited by tax treaties.
Anticipating and planning for international tax risks is key. A basic requirement is to investigate fully the laws and regulations, tax wise and treaty included, in all countries of operation. *Have a sound and supportable transfer pricing policy and be consistent with it. A clear substance and commercial rationale behind all structures and transactions is paramount to withstand tax authority challenges. It’s important to keep an eye on developments in the world of international tax legislation, including BEPS measures. Lastly, establishing a global tax risk-management framework, utilizing outside experts when appropriate and maintaining open communication with tax authorities can mitigate exposure to the potential of disputes, penalties or harm to reputation.
Key Considerations in International Tax Planning
Efficient international tax planning is thus an integral part of any potentially successful global business enterprise. This is not about tax evasion, but about formulating an efficient structure that is responsible and fits with the business model. This process starts with a thorough scrutiny of the company’s footprint for operations where it produces products, holds IP, provides services and sells to customers. The selection of legal form in the respective jurisdictions is an important aspect as branch and subsidiary have different tax implications. One of the key ingredients is learning to combine your home-countries’ tax laws with those of the hosting country. This has to do with withholding tax rates on dividends, interest and royalties –and how double taxation agreements can help cut this cost. Finally, repatriation of earnings also needs to be factored into the planning; developing a tax-efficient way to get foreign earnings back to the home office is critical for shareholder value. A comprehensive approach is one that embeds tax considerations in any significant tool of business: from market entry, product strategy and supply chain to mergers and acquisitions. Such strategic alignment can prevent costly surprises, and position the company for long-term, sustainable success in a global market.
"Substance" has become a building block of bona fide international tax planning in today's world of increasing tax transparency and regulation. Tax authorities worldwide are demonstrating a growing appetite to challenge structures with no real economic activity and commercial rationale. This means that it’s not enough to stand up a holding company in a low-tax jurisdiction said entity must have real substance, e.g. physical offices, trained staff and active management actions associated with the income being generated. The OECD’s BEPS initiative has further strengthened this principle, demanding that entities profit-taxable profits are more closely aligned to the places where value is generated. If, for example a subsidiary is to claim vast profits from intellectual property developed and commercialised in other jurisdictions it will have to be able to show that it is carrying out the most important functions in relation to the development enhancement maintenance protection exploitation (DEMPE) of that IP. If the appropriate substance is not established, this may result in a re-allocation of profits to higher taxed countries with significant tax corrections being imposed together with interest and large penalties. So strong documentation and a narrative to explain how income is linked to genuine economic substance, are essential elements of any supportable international tax position which will survive the ram raid attack straight through the company’s front counter.
The treatment of international tax is a complex area which demands dynamism and an eye on the future. International tax regimes are consistently changing, as countries adjust their domestic laws and treatymaking to adapt to economic strains and changes in international policies. One of the bedrock principles underpinning this new world order, and being pushed through via implementation of the OECD’s Two-Pillar Solution involving a global minimum tax and new rules around assigning profits, is one of its most momentous shifts in a century. Businesses need to have a dynamic monitoring mechanism in place to continuously monitor and track these legislative changes & evaluate their impact on the global structure of their business with respect to tax. It is important to closely follow tax law developments and, more importantly, grasp how attitudes by various tax authorities have evolved when it comes to what matters most to them in the context of enforcement. And a successful strategy also should involve intermittent assessments of the current state of the corporate structure to ensure that it still is efficient and compliant in light of any recent changes in regulation. Running the numbers on how hypothetical changes to tax laws may affect you is one of many examples of scenario planning, which can yield helpful strategic insights. Through an attitude of continuous adaptation and preparedness, businesses can successfully steer the level of uncertainty and lessen the risks rising up to lead with a competitive edge in an evolving global tax space.